When Will We Rein in these Deliverers of Death?


Yep, it’s happened again.  On December 1, 2012,  a car plowed into the rear of an SUV holding students from the Shenendehowa High School.  The SUV flipped and rolled, crossing over three traffic lanes and ending up on a median.  Two students were killed.  Two more were seriously injured.  It is way past time to do something about this carnage:

  • August 29th, 2012 — A centenarian backed his Cadillac onto a sidewalk across from the Main Street Elementary School near Los Angeles.  Fourteen people, nine of them children, were mowed down.
  • July 29th, 2012 — A driver rammed his car through a barricade and into a helpless crowd of people attending a street festival in Cleveland.  One dead, four injured.
  • October 20th, 2006 — An 86-year-old motorist slammed his car at high speed into the horrified assembled patrons of an open-air market in Santa Monica.  Ten people killed, another 63 wounded.

And then there are the acts of terrorism:

  • March 3rd, 2006 — An Iranian-American citizen confessed to intentionally using his SUV to plow into a group of students at the University of North Carolina campus at Chapel Hill in an act designed to, “. . . avenge the deaths of Muslims worldwide,” and to “punish” the government of the United States.  Nine people were wounded.
  • February 26th, 1993 — Terrorists drove into the parking garage beneath the North Tower of the World Trade Center a truck containing a fertilizer bomb.  The intention was to topple the North Tower directly into the South Tower, bringing down both structures and killing tens of thousands in the heart of New York City’s Financial District.  Fortunately, the amount of explosive used was insufficient.  Nevertheless, there were 1,048 casualties — six of them fatalities.
  • April 19th, 1995 — 168 confirmed dead (including 19 children under the age of six), over 680 wounded in the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.  The Murrah Building was but one of 324 buildings in a sixteen-block radius that were either damaged or destroyed.  The implement of death — an explosive-laden Ford F700 truck rented from Ryder.
  • May 18th, 1927 — The worst attack on a public school in the history of the United States took place in Bath Township, Michigan.  Forty-four people lost their lives, all but six of them pupils at the elementary school.  Another 58 people were injured.  This time two bombs were used, the second of which involved yet another Ford truck converted into a shrapnel-filled death wagon.

If ever there were a time to get these implements of death off the road, now is it.  Many of the vehicles causing this daily carnage (over 32,000 dead in 2011 alone; untold tens of thousands more wounded) were never meant to be in civilian hands.  Take the infamous Jeep — the forerunner of many of today’s Sport Utility Vehicles — derived from the deadly Willys MB of World War II.  Or the more current Hummer (the epitome of the death vehicle) which had its roots in the devastating U.S. military’s High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle.  And while trucks in general (and Ford trucks in particular it would seem) may not have been designed with the military in mind, the Bath, Murrah, and World Trade Center bombings speak volumes as to the dangers of their misuse.

Willys MB “Jeep”

Modern Assault Jeep — Beauty may be skin deep, but death goes all the way to the drive shaft

We simply have no choice but to remove from civilian hands these assault vehicles, be they trucks or SUVs.

Then there’s the question of the high-capacity fuel tanks.  Nobody really needs a thirty-gallon (113-liter) fuel tank.  All a thirty-gallon tank does is make it easier for criminals or drunks to continue unabated their orgy of death without the need to stop and refuel their assault vehicles.  If Timothy McVeigh had to refuel more often the massive Ryder Ford F700 assault truck he was using, each and every 7-11 gas stop would have increased the chances of someone’s suspicions being aroused and the tragedy averted.

The Original “Hummer”

And finally we need to seriously take a look at vehicle passenger load, as such loading is directly related to total vehicle weight (mass).  More mass, after all, means more death and destruction.  I don’t care how big your family is, there is simply no justification for high-passenger load assault minivans ever falling into private hands.  Nobody should be allowed a vehicle that holds more than four adults.

Deadly Offspring — The modern-day civilian assault vehicle

Have a family of five?

Make two trips and reload.

Over Two Tons of Rolling Death (3 tons fully loaded) — High Capacity 20-gallon tank, Excessive THREE ROWS of SEATS!!!

Future Articles:

  • Banning High-Capacity Magazines — Let’s End Those Paper Cuts NOW!
  • Maxing Out Megapixels — a Tale of Digital Death
  • Limiting Limousines — Lethal Luxury in Leather
  • Banning the Blooming Onion — Aiming at the Assault Appetizer

5 Comments

Filed under Author, Opinion Piece

El Paso Museum of Art — Part 3


Sorry for the postponement of the final part in my series on the El Paso Museum of Art.  Here are the links to Parts 1 and 2 should you feel the need to refresh:

El Paso Museum of Art —1

El Paso Museum of Art —2

Here’s the view of downtown El Paso from just outside the El Paso Museum of Art:

Outside the El Paso Museum of Art

Outside the El Paso Museum of Art

Outside the El Paso Museum of Art

Outside the El Paso Museum of Art

But if you think that’s intriguing, wait until you get inside.  Not only is EPMA home to a large sampling of the famed Kress Collection, EPMA houses more modern art as well:

Something a bit more modern in the EPMA collection

Something a bit more modern in the EPMA collection

Recently, however, EPMA hosted a rather impressive exhibit of European masters.  You saw examples from my favorite European masters on Wednesday.  Ursula’s tastes run more to the religious artworks of the masters, and her favorite that day was this example from Rubens:

Rubens

Rubens

There were certainly a large number of European masters whose works were represented during this wonderful and exciting exhibition, and the event was certainly well attended (although my pictures do not reflect that as I timed my shots between the marauding hordes of art lovers):

Rembrandt, Rubens, and European Painters Exhibit

Rembrandt, Rubens, and European Painters Exhibit

Rembrandt, Rubens, and European Painters Exhibit

Rembrandt, Rubens, and European Painters Exhibit

Rembrandt, Rubens, and European Painters Exhibit

Rembrandt, Rubens, and European Painters Exhibit

Rembrandt, Rubens, and European Painters Exhibit

Rembrandt, Rubens, and European Painters Exhibit

Rembrandt, Rubens, and European Painters Exhibit

Rembrandt, Rubens, and European Painters Exhibit

1 Comment

Filed under Photography, travel

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner — Words I Wrote in 2009!


I’m going to interrupt this week’s series on the El Paso Museum of Art for some breaking news (and an “I told you so”).  Look for the third and final installment on EPMA on Monday.  Meanwhile:

Just before I retired from the FAA I submitted to my literary agent an exposé on the FAA under Administrator Marion C. Blakey.  Try as he might, my agent could not find a publisher for that book.  The responses from many was that The Tombstone Agency was just too terrifying to see print.

As I’m writing these words (Wednesday, January 16, 2013), the FAA has just announced the grounding of Boeing’s new 787 Dreamliner.  This came within hours of a grounding of Dreamliners in Japan.  And once again, my words have been validated by events.  Below are excerpts of what I had to say back in 2009 on the subject of Administrator Blakey’s decision to allow aircraft manufacturers to practically self-certify their own aircraft as airworthy, with particular focus on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

What’s that, you say?  Self-certify?  Their own aircraft?  Isn’t that like that fox and hen house thing?  Surely you jest.

I never jest about aviation safety,  and don’t call me “Shirley.”  From the Seattle Times concerning an extension of a Blakey-era mandate that redefined airlines and aircraft manufacturers as “customers”:

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on Tuesday extended the authority of Boeing Commercial Airplanes to self-certify its aircraft and aircraft technologies. Under the agency’s new safety oversight model, Boeing manufacturing and engineering employees will perform delegated tasks for the FAA, including signing certificates approving new designs.

That above excerpt was written in August of 2009, well after Marion Blakey had done her damage and moved on to greener pastures.  But her legacy continues to this day.

Now that you’ve digested the above (Getting the flick on Marion Blakey by now?  If not, see the links at the end of this article.), here’s what I said back in 2009:

Flight Standards Division —
Certifications of New Aircraft

Aircraft certifications—both completed and ongoing—are so tainted by bonus-hungry, customer-oriented managers as to be worthless as far as the flying public is concerned.  No one should feel safe stepping aboard any aircraft certified as airworthy during this time period, or even if any part of the certification process was conducted over the past seven years.

That includes the new Boeing 787 Dreamliner.  Indeed in February 2009, the FAA rewrote its own certification rules on fuel tank safety—rules written in the aftermath of the 1996 TWA 800 Boeing 747 explosion—because the Dreamliner could not meet those standards.  An unprecedented 190 FAA Engineers signed a letter deeming this move, “… an unjustified step backward in safety.”  And those FAA Engineers were backed up by other voices outside the Agency.  In the words of former NTSB Chairman Jim Hall, “It appears that management has overruled the judgment of the people [who] have day-to-day responsibility for the safety of aircraft.”

And:

Flight Standards Division —
Certifications of New Aircraft

Currently, specific Flight Standards District Offices (FSDO) have certification authority over aircraft manufacturers within their geographic area of jurisdiction.  Since, for instance, Boeing’s new aircraft will always be inspected by the FSDO serving Washington State, then the FAA inspectors and more importantly their managers will over time develop a relationship with Boeing and Boeing personnel.  This is only human nature.

But human nature and personal relationships have no business in ensuring the safety of the flying public.  As such, this practice simply has to stop.  The recent rewriting of fuel tank standards by FAA FSDO managers because Boeing’s new 787 Dreamliner could not meet requirements is a classic example.  Until this symbiotic relationship is abolished, aircraft certifications will always be tainted because of how the system was gamed under the Blakey regime.

The only way to fix this is to rotate certifications of new aircraft among FSDO personnel assigned outside the geographical area.  Expensive?  Yes.  But then so is the crash of a Boeing 787 carrying 300+ passengers—not to mention the impact to business Boeing would incur should other countries no longer accept FAA certifications because of mistrust or scandal.

Managers need to have their mandates narrowed in scope.  They should oversee the performance and needs of their inspectors.  They should never be in a position to overturn the findings of their own inspectors; they have neither the expertise nor the direct knowledge of the inspector to justify such actions.

One final recommendation:  Under no circumstance should anyone in FSDO ever be allowed to refer to any aircraft manufacturer as a ‘customer.’  They are not.

Here’s those promised links for more on Marion Blakey:

Comments Off on The Boeing 787 Dreamliner — Words I Wrote in 2009!

Filed under Aviation Safety