Category Archives: Firearms

Replacing a Home Defense Weapon


The FNH FNX-45 — 15+1 rounds of potent .45 ACP ammunition

The FNH FNX-45 — 15+1 rounds of potent .45 ACP ammunition

Before you get too far into this article, be advised that this is a non-shooting first-impression.  I will give a more in-depth review of the shooting characteristics of the FNX-45 at a later date.

The Entire FNX Kit

The Entire FNX Kit — Three magazines included

While I consider anything from .32 ACP on up to be perfectly adequate for concealed carry protection, I prefer the .45 ACP for home defense.  Barring a person stoned out of their mind, someone breaking into your home has already made a conscious decision to do you harm if they find you inside.  Sorry, but that’s just a fact.  As such, you want that person down and out as soon as possible, and the bigger the cartridge the better.  The .45 ACP with it’s heavy weight and low velocity (for reduced chance of over-penetration and consequent danger to innocents) makes it in my opinion the best home defense option outside of a shotgun or a semiautomatic rifle.

And when it comes to home defense, the more rounds the better (hear that well, those of you who would arbitrarily classify 10-round or even 6-round magazines as “high-capacity”).  Home invasions frequently involve more than one intruder, and the number of rounds necessary to stop a determined threat (depending on what study you read) can reach three or even more.  The last thing you want facing multiple dangerous thugs is to be one round short.

FNX, PT 24/7, and SW99

FNX, PT 24/7, and SW99

I now possess four handguns chambered for this proven, highly effective round.  One you’ve already read about:  SW99 — The .45-Caliber Walther.  The SW99 is a nice weapon, but at 9+1 rounds it lacks a bit in capacity.  Another is a SIG P220 Compact SAS Gen 2 which, at 6+1 rounds, is better suited for concealed carry and, with night sights, nighttime carry at that.  So, my initial choice for home defense became the Taurus PT 24/7 Pro DS with 12+1 capacity.  My previous XD45 Tactical with 13+1 was a weapon I just could never warm up to — neither double-action first pull nor external safety for me makes for a weapon that should not find a place inside your home.  They’re quite simply too dangerous to have around, as police department accidental/negligent discharge statistics on transitioning to the Glock have repeatedly shown (That’s personal opinion, so don’t shoot the messenger . . . so to speak).  The PT 24/7 had both an external safety and a double-action first pull, and the added benefit of allowing for cocked-and-locked configuration (something I wouldn’t do, but which fans of the 1911 will enjoy).

Cocked-and-Locked 1911-Style

Cocked-and-Locked 1911-Style

Alas, the PT 24/7 proved unreliable, and the more rounds I put through it the worse it became.  Eventually, I was experiencing multiple jams on each and every magazine.  It went back to the factory for warranty work and returned with vastly improved trigger and a short list of fixes accomplished, but I never test fired the repaired weapon as I simply had lost faith in it.  It’s going to my favorite local gun store on consignment where hopefully the next owner will be happy with the repairs made to it.

Length Comparison

Length Comparison

The lesson here is that you get what you pay for.  The Taurus is an extremely affordable handgun.  I purchased it new for just under $320.  But it turned out to be a false economy, and I began a search for a replacement.  That search narrowed to the Heckler & Koch HK45 and the FNH FNP-45, both reportedly finalists in the (unfortunately) cancelled DoD Joint Combat Pistol evaluation to replace the combat inadequate 9mm Beretta M9.  The FNX is an improved, fully ambidextrous version of the FNP, and the HK USP is the genesis for the HK45.  After considerable research and extensive hands-on testing of the trigger and ergonomics at my favorite local gun store (Collector’s Gun Exchange), I settled on the FNX-45.

Height Comparison

Height Comparison

The decision was not even close.  The FNX-45 had by far the better trigger in both double- and single-action modes.  The grip felt more natural.  The controls are easy to manipulate, intuitively placed, and fully ambidextrous — a nice feature for those times when walls, obstacles, or even injury may require you to fire using your off hand.  If you’re left handed, this has got to be a real plus.

Fully Ambidextrous Controls

Fully Ambidextrous Controls

As you can see from the above, these are not small weapons.  As such they are not really suited for concealed carry.  The two+ pound weight of the FNX along with an additional pound of ammunition once it’s fully loaded makes this an even sillier choice.  But, then, as I said this wasn’t the task assigned to this particular handgun.  Carry duty remains the function of my Walther P99c AS, Walther PPK, and Walther PPK/S pistols.  Different jobs require different tools.

Attached Laser Sight — A nice home defense option

Attached Laser Sight — A nice home defense option

Disassembly and reassembly of the FNX is the easiest and quickest of any weapon I have ever owned other than my PPK and PPK/S.  I can break down the pistol and put in back together in under half a minute, and that’s with no real practice.  Lock back the slide, rotate the take-down lever, release the slide and ease it forward off the frame, then remove the recoil spring and barrel and you’re done.  It’s just that simple, and notice that there is no need to pull the trigger to remove the slide — no need to “Glockify” this weapon with unnecessary trigger pulls.

Extremely Easy Disassembly and Reassembly

Extremely Easy Disassembly and Reassembly

Internally, this weapon sports a feature I’ve not yet seen in a polymer pistol.  FNH claim that the frame rails on polymer pistols are prone to wear after extensive round counts (I have to believe they’re talking in excess of 100,000 rounds here, but who knows?).  As such, FNH have installed into the FNX replaceable metal frame rails.  Nice feature, though I doubt most people would ever need to do that.

Replaceable Frame Rails

Replaceable Frame Rails

Regardless, this detail seems a testament to the attention which FNH have placed into the design of this weapon.  Now, let us hope that the performance equals the promise.

Now for my impressions on the triggers.  For this I added a fourth .45 ACP weapon to the mix — my recently acquired SIG P220 Compact SAS Gen 2.  I tested all weapons using both hands (dry firing) in back-to-back comparisons in both double- and single-action modes.

Double-Action Results:  The SIG P220 and the FNX weapons are both hammer-fired.  The SW99 and and Taurus PT 24/7 use strikers.  In head-to-head comparisons I found the two striker-fired weapons had lighter pulls.  All four though were perfectly acceptable, with a steady pull followed by a clean break.  The SW99 however had the best double-action trigger.  The SIG P220 was my second favorite because of the smoothness of the trigger, followed closely by the FNX.  The 24/7 brought up the rear because of the long pull and a less solid feel (completely subjective), but the trigger was much better than before the Taurus was sent in for warranty work.

Single-Action Results:  Here it was a hammer-fired weapon that came out on top — the SIG P220.  The SIG had a shorter pull, lighter trigger, and crisper break by far.  It wasn’t even close.  Next came the SW99 with a fairly short pull once the trigger was taken out of Anti-Stress (AS) mode and placed into single-action (see my SW99 review for an explanation).  The FNX placed third because of a mushy quarter-inch pause from the time the slack was taken up to the point where the hammer tripped.  The FNX wasn’t bad, it just wasn’t as great as the SIG and the SW99.  I’m thinking this will probably improve after a couple of hundred rounds are pushed through it.  Coming in last (and proving once again that you get what you pay for) was the 24/7.  The trigger pull in single-action is ridiculously long — as long as the double-action pull — although the trigger does have a short reset if you ride it forward.  Once the excessive slack is taken up, the trigger broke cleanly and predictably.

All things considered, I would rate these weapons as follows:

  1. SIG P220 SAS Gen 2, which is also by far the most expensive of the lot.  Not related to the trigger, but — oh, brother, does SIG put on a great set of night sights on these things.  Too bad it’s so thick yet only holds 6+1 rounds.
  2. SW99.  For the price you just can’t beat the safety and consistency of Walther’s AS trigger system.  If you decide to get this discontinued .45 ACP (Walther made the frames; Smith & Wesson the barrels and slides), make sure you get the AS trigger over the other options.
  3. FNX, the second most expensive and, trigger-wise, not far behind the SW99.  However, taking into consideration that 15+1 capacity in .45 ACP, I would rate this over the SW99 when this feature is considered.  As a home defense weapon, it would even top the SIG P220 because of its high capacity.
  4. Taurus PT 24/7 Pro DS is the economy weapon of the lot, but not when you can pick up a used SW99 for the price of one of these brand new.  The trigger isn’t bad, it just doesn’t compare to the other weapons listed.  Capacity is great at 12+1, coming in at only one round less than my long-departed Springfield Armory XD45 Tactical (what a terrible trigger that thing had).  If you’re willing to take a chance and you get a Taurus that actually fires consistently without jamming, this may work for you if you’re on a budget.  Fortunately, the Taurus offer a lifetime warranty.  Unfortunately, they don’t offer reimbursement for your cost of shipping it out to them.  That’s pretty bad when you consider that this particular weapon was failing from the start, and only getting worse.

Let me close with a hearty “congratulation” to the citizens of Illinois in general and the those currently under daily siege in Chicago in particular.  Yesterday your state legislature overrode Governor Pat Quinn’s ill-advised veto of Illinois’ recently passed, court-mandated concealed carry law.  The law as passed is still ridiculously over-restrictive, but no longer is Illinois the last state in the Union to deny its citizens the right to defend themselves.  This is particularly fitting coming on the heels of this past weekend’s horrendous gun crime statistics — seventy people gunned down in Chicago, a dozen dead.  The day of waiting for the police to pick up evidence and the medical examiner to haul away the body bag is finally in sight.  It’s been a long, dangerous, and bloody haul, but soon the cowardly gang-banger who pulls out a weapon will have to consider if a law-abiding and properly trained citizen is going to return fire and make him the “victim” for a change.  Right now no such deterrent exists.  Rest assured, Chicago — your violent crime rate is about to take a dive.

1 Comment

Filed under Firearms

Hate to Say, “I Told You So,” But . . .


Actually, I do enjoy saying it.

Remember this little satirical gem?  Link:  When Will We Rein in these Deliverers of Death?

Well, it’s happened again.  This time an incredible sixty people were wounded, some critically.  Three had to be helicop0tered out of the carnage, and another dozen or so were transported to hospitals by ambulance.  Here’s the gory story in all its glory:  Up to 60 Injured After Car Drives into Va. Parade

Seeing as how we’re frequently told by some of our elected nannies . . . er, officials . . . that we can’t be trusted with these:

Or especially one of these:

Then by the same logic, and taking into consideration the vastly higher injury and death rate associated with automobiles, I’m sure it’s only a matter of days before Senator Dianne Feinstein and others take action to outlaw these from falling into the wrong hands (meaning your hands):

A Vehicle of DEATH

This is not hyperbole, my friends.  The argument for depriving you of one also justifies depriving you of the other, or perhaps taking away your access to fast food hamburgers and fried chicken, or denying to you large soda drinks at the theater, or stripping you of that swimming pool in your backyard.

You may not own a firearm.  You may have no desire to do so.  You may even fear and loathe them.  But remember this:  Whenever an elected official tells you — a law abiding citizen with a clean record of responsibility — that you cannot be trusted with something and that they’re limiting your access for your own good, don’t expect them to stop short at just those items with which you personally disagree or don’t own.  They won’t.  New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has proven that point quite conclusively (“Okay, scum — this is the NYPD.  Slowly put down that Big Gulp and very carefully back away.  Let us see your hands at all times, dirt bag.”)

Indeed, as a rule of thumb, you should not trust with your vote any elected official who expresses a distrust in you.

By the way, the so-called “assault rifle” pictured above is a 9mm Beretta Cx4 Storm.  It can also be purchased chambered for the .40 S&W and .45 ACP, which like the 9mm are pistol rounds that are less damaging to living tissue than the .223 round commonly used in more traditional semiautomatic rifles, including so-called “assault” weapons.  That Cx4 is on Senator Feinstein’s list of proposed banned weapons.

Now take a look at the following two rifles:

.223 Caliber Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle

.223 Caliber Ruger Mini-14 Tactical Rifle

Both are functionally the same.  Both employ the exact same firing and chambering mechanisms.  Both use the same caliber round.  Both fire at the same rate — one bullet each time the trigger is squeezed (the definition of “semiautomatic” as opposed to “automatic,” which can fire multiple rounds with one squeeze of the trigger).  Both will accept so-called “high-capacity” magazines.  One is on the proposed banned list, the other is not.  Now, quick, what’s the difference that justifies that?

Answer:  The second rifle magically transformed itself into an “assault weapon” when Ruger added that recoil compensator on the firing end of the barrel.  That’s it.  No other modifications whatsoever.  In other words, the Mini-14 Tactical is on the banned list because of one thing, and one thing only — it looks scarier than the Mini-14 Ranch Rifle pictured above it.

And that Cx4 that fires the much more modest 9mm pistol round?  Why was it singled out for banishment, you ask?  Has absolutely nothing to do with function, capability, or destructive potential.  Once again this rifle finds itself on the list because it looks scary — it has a pistol grip and comes with multiple Picatinny rails that can be used to attach to the carbine anything from an optical sight or tactical flashlight to a laser for better target acquisition (which I would think is a good thing — who wants someone using a rifle to accidentally shoot something or someone at which they’re not aiming?)

This is but one reason why Senator Feinstein, Mayor Bloomberg, and others are simply not taken seriously by those who know, understand, and use firearms.  Their demonstrable ignorance on the subject would fill a book.  Indeed, Mayor Bloomberg was just a few months ago positively humiliated on ABC’s Nightline when Cynthia McFadden had to stop the interview to correct him on his insistence that semiautomatics fire multiple rounds for as long as the trigger was pulled.

Remember this level of ignorance the next time you listen to the gun control debate.  Then, the next time you’re at the airport removing your shoes, belt, and then entering a scanner for a virtual strip search, I want you to consider this:  When did you become the threat to national security while Congress’ laws allow real terrorists unfettered access to the our nation under the guise of “asylum,” are then given taxpayer funded assistance, and then turned loose unsupervised so that they may plant bombs at marathons?  And these same elected officials want to then disarm you because you’re the threat?

Really?

3 Comments

Filed under Firearms, Opinion Piece

A Rare Find — Walther PP .32 ACP Made in Post-War Germany


Walther PP in 7.65mm (.32 ACP)

Walther PP in 7.65mm (.32 ACP)

Because of the popularity of a certain fictional English spy, many people in the U.S. are familiar with the German Walther PPK — a very compact, highly concealable handgun originally designed around the .32 ACP (7.65mm) cartridge.  What is lesser known is that the PPK, originally produced in 1931, was in turn a redesigned, more compact version of the 1929 Walther PP, and that the Walther PP was one of the most popular police weapons ever produced.  Indeed, only recently have some national police departments discontinued their use and, yes, believe it or not Wikipedia still lists the PPK variant as being in service at MI6.

A third variant, the PPK/S, mates the larger PP frame to the smaller PPK slide and barrel, and has been exceedingly popular in this country since its inception in 1968 (in response to the ill-conceived and poorly written Gun Control Act of that year).  It is still produced to this day by Smith & Wesson in both .32 ACP and .380 ACP (9mm kurz).

S&W Versions of the PPK (.32 ACP) and PPK/S (.380 ACP)

PP, by the way, is short for Polizei Pistole (which translates to “police pistol”), and PPK is Polizei Pistole Kriminal (meaning police pistol detective model).

Shorter, lighter PPK frame on left; larger, heftier PP frame used by the PPK/S on right

After World War II until 1986, all .32 ACP and .380 ACP Walther-authorized European-made PP-series pistols were produced by Manurhin of France.  That includes even those Walthers with West German proof marks.  Walthers displaying West German proofs were in fact shipped from Manurhin to Ulm for final assembly and testing.  Only from 1986 onward, until the late 1990s, were Walther PP-series pistols once again made in Germany — at Walther’s manufacturing facility in Ulm.  (see:  Fun Photo Friday — 1940 Zella-Mehlis Walther PP for an earlier all-German Walther PP)

Walther PP in 7.65mm (.32 ACP)

Walther PP in 7.65mm (.32 ACP)

That means that most post-war PP-series pistols in the U.S. were either made in the U.S., first by Ranger Manufacturing for the now-defunct Interarms Company and later by S&W, or are of either German or French manufacture.  Other variants exist (many being illegal copies, especially from the former Soviet Block countries), but those are exceedingly rare here.  As for pre-war versions, those are all exclusively from Germany, and many were brought to the U.S. by returning servicemen or imported by Sam Cumming’s International Armament Corporation (Interarmco, and later Interarms) before he acquired the rights to manufacture here in the U.S. under the Walther banner the PPK and PPK/S versions.

German Proof Marks

German Proof Marks

On a side note — Sam Cummings was quite a character, and it’s reputed that his Interarms was initially a front company for the CIA.  Sam Cummings (more on him here) was the inspiration for the character of Sterling Heyward (and his father) in my murder mystery The Globe, and Interarms was the basis for the fictional InterGlobal Armaments mentioned in the same book.

German Proof Marks — Closeup; the “KC” code indicates a 1992 manufacture date

So, why am I bringing up this firearms history lesson?  Blame Saturday, and blame my favorite local gun store.

Post-war PPK and PPK/S pistols may be found practically everywhere in the U.S. (mostly of U.S. manufacture).  The post-war PP is a bit more of a challenge, as none were produced in this country.  Finding a true, post-war, West German-manufactured Walther PP is flat-out difficult.  Finding one without any import markings is even harder.  Finding one in .32 ACP (never a very popular round in the U.S. where caliber is king and .380 ACP is deemed by many to be the minimum cartridge suitable for a defensive round) is indeed rare.  Finding one in near pristine condition is practically impossible.  Finding one at an affordable price . . . well, forget it.  Or so I thought.

Here’s what my good friends at El Paso’s Collectors Gun Exchange were dying to show me the moment I walked into the store:

Original Box

Original Box

Post-war Walther PP in case

Post-war Walther PP in case

How good a deal was it?  I snagged this remarkable example for less than the suggested retail price of a new S&W PPK or PPK/S.

Expect a full review once I get this gem out onto the range.  As an added bonus, I’ll be comparing it to an Interarms PPK/S (.380 ACP), a Smith & Wesson PPK/S (.380 ACP), a European PPK/S (.22 LR), and a Smith & Wesson version of the iconic PPK in .32 ACP.

Interarms-imported, German-proofed Walther PPK/S in .22 LR

And now a mystery:  The Berlin Wall came tumbling down in early November, 1989.  The reunification of Germany became official on October 3 the following year.  So, why does a Walther made in 1992 bear the mark “W. Germany” on the slide?

13 Comments

Filed under Firearms