Quasimodo’s Replacements (Humor)


This week I’ll be highlighting some of my writing and storytelling.  Let’s face it, I am an author, and this blog is my “business card” for those who might be interested in purchasing my novel Decisions, soon to be followed by three other novels—The Ian Drake Series.  So, this week we’re going to have some fun, and today’s humorous little story is the tale of Quasimodo‘s replacements—Bill & Bob . . . the Bellringer twins.

After Quasimodo’s unfortunate and rather sad ending, the Archbishop of Paris sent forth throughout the lands a proclamation advertising for a replacement bell ringer for his beloved Notre Dame Cathedral.  But the Archbishop was a busy man, so he handed off the task of conducting the job interviews to the least senior priest, Father Barclay “Bat” Belfry.

Unfortunately, the Archbishop was notoriously cheap, and the advertised salary did little to attract qualified candidates, so the requirement for an MA in bell ringing had to be waived for the sole applicant for the job, a man known only a Bob . . .  Bob the Bell Ringer.  But there was a problem far beyond Bob’s lack of a college degree in bell ringing.  He lacked something else even more important, at least in the eyes of Father Bat Belfry.  For, you see, Bob had neither hands nor arms, and how does one pull on the bell ropes without the prerequisite “tools” for the job?  To put it bluntly, Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer . . . just wasn’t handy enough for the task.  And it was precisely on this point that Father Bat initially declined to hire Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer.

But Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer . . . was both persistent and persuasive in getting Father Bat to test his bell ringing skills.  And so it was, with some trepidation, that Father Bat and Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer, made the trek to the belfry of Notre Dame for the audition.

Reaching his favorite architectural feature, the belfry, Father Bat pointed to the main bell and said, “Okay, Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer . . . here’s your chance.  Show me what you’ve got.”

So, Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer . . . stepped all the way back to the precipice, lowered his head, and took off at a full run for the bell.  He struck the bell full-force directly with his face, and the bell responded with what was perhaps the most pleasing sound Father Bat had ever heard.  It was positively beautiful, and far richer than that achieved through the bell’s clapper alone.

Unfortunately, Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer . . . was so stunned by the impact that he stumbled backward and fell to his death in the streets below.

A group of Parisians started gathering around the body.  Two of the bystanders, who happend to go by the typical French names of Louis and Crabbe, were looking down at the body and just shaking their heads.  Suddenly, Crabbe pointed down at the body and said to Louis, “Hey!  Isn’t that . . . isn’t that Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer?”

Louis shrugged and said, “The name’s not familiar, but the face sure rings a bell.”

But wait.  That’s not all.

The next day Father Bat was surprised by the early morning visit of a man who looked just like the hapless Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer.  And just like Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer . . . this young man also had no college degree, no hands, and no arms.

The stranger explained, “My name is Bill . . . Bill the Bell Ringer.  I’m Bob’s . . . Bob the Bell Ringer’s . . . twin brother, and I’m here to restore the family honor by taking up where my brother fell short.”

Father Bat replied, “Your brother Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer . . . did not fall short.  He fell all the way to the street.”

“That’s not exactly what I meant,” said Bill . . . Bill the Bell Ringer.

Regardless of what Bill . . . Bill the Bell Ringer . . . meant, Father Bat was adamant that the horrors of the day before would not be repeated.  He was already in deep trouble with the Archbishop for being stupid enough to audition Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer.  There was no way he wanted to repeat that error.

But after hours of begging and pleading, Father Bat found himself leading the way back into the belfry with Bill . . . Bill the Bell Ringer . . . in tow.  Reaching the top, Bill repeated his brother’s performance by backing up and launching himself full-force and full-face directly into the fabled main bell.  And once again the bell let loose with the most beautiful sound Father Bat had ever heard, even more beautiful than that from the day before.

Unfortunately, Bill . . . Bill the Bell Ringer . . . proved no less susceptible to the rigors of ringing a bell with his face than had his brother Bob . . . Bob the Bell Ringer.  And so it was with horror that Father Bat watched as the stunned Bill . . . Bill the Bell Ringer . . . took the same path to glory as that of his brother, plunging into the streets below.

Once again, in the streets of Paris, and for the second day in a row, a crowd of Parisians gathered around yet another fallen bell ringer.  In the crowd, just as they were before, were the two friends, Crabbe and Louis.

And just like the day before, Crabbe pointed to the lifeless body and said to Louis, “Hey!  Isn’t that . . . isn’t that Bill . . . Bill the Bell Ringer?”

Louis rubbed his jaw thoughtfully before replying, “You know, I’m not really sure.  But I know one thing.”

“What’s that?” Crabbe asked

“This guy’s a dead ringer for the guy who was here yesterday.”

2 Comments

Filed under Author, Humor, Writing

4th of July Fireworks Part II (and how I did them)


In Wednesday’s blog,  I presented photographs I took of fireworks during Monday’s 4th of July celebration here in El Paso, Texas.  Today I’ll highlight  more pictures taken that same evening, and this time I’ll give you information on how I took them.

I more and more frequently find myself using a simple point-and-shoot for much of my photographic needs, but occasionally I simply have to get out the more sophisticated equipment to get the most out of certain subjects.  For these shots I used my trusty, tried-and-true  Canon EOS 5D.  The great thing about the 5D is that it was the first “affordable” digital single lens reflex (DSLR) on the market using a 35mm-equivalent sensor.  That means that not only would all my older Canon 35mm lenses work with the EOS 5D, but they would also have the same magnification factor as they did with my 35mm film cameras of the past.

The glass I chose for this outing was my only L-series, professional grade Canon lens—my Canon 24-105mm f/4 L IS (Image Stabilized) zoom.  This is my favorite lens, and the one that fills the requirements for the vast majority of my shooting situations.  It’s just that versatile, and the f/4 aperture in conjunction with the EOS 5D’s exceptional low noise performance at high ISO settings make it a true godsend in low light situations.

Also included in my kit that night was a tripod and, of course, a remote switch.  In the old days, our “remote switches” were cable releases that screwed into a small hole atop the shutter release button.  In the digital age, they’re now electronic switches that plug into the side of the camera to allow operation of the shutter without the need to touch the camera, thus reducing the likelihood of camera shake or vibration ruining the shot.  My choice of remote switch is the Canon RS-80N3.

Now, the important stuff—camera settings:  I set the ISO to 100 to minimize noise.  I also have Custom Function 02 (C.Fn-02) on my EOS 5D set to option 2.  But you don’t care about that.  You just want to know what it does:  This setting applies additional in-camera noise-reduction processing for all exposures over one second.  Pictures were taken in Canon raw format to allow for the most leeway in post-processing, but I believe I could have obtained pretty much the same quality if I’d set the camera to shoot in JPEG format.  White balance was manually set to “tungsten” to give a more pleasing “warmth” to the colors.  I used Canon’s “Standard” picture style to obtain the highest preset color saturation because, let’s face it, with fireworks it’s all about the colors.  The lens was zoomed to approximately 40mm to obtain a sufficient amount of width to capture the action, yet still narrow the range enough to bring out detail from the bursts.  Exposure times were mostly in the one- to four-second range using the aforementioned remote switch, but some of the photographs were exposed for up to eight seconds with no visible degradation in quality or increase in detectable noise levels.  The lens aperture was stopped down to f9.0.  This was an arbitrary decision on my part, and it turned out to be almost exactly what I needed.  The aperture was wide enough to capture even the smaller sparkles, yet not so wide as to blow out detail in the brighter areas.  Indeed, in post processing I found that I could comfortably increase highlights without fear of blowing out details and colors.

The camera was placed in portrait orientation atop the tripod to take full advantage of the vertical travel of the rockets.

Post processing was kept to a minimum.  Indeed, after conversion to JPEG, the only post processing I did were minor tweaks in saturation, bumping up the highlights, and some creative cropping to increase the visual impact of the shots.  Conversion from raw was performed using Canon’s Digital Photo Professional, which I also used to correct lens aberration prior to conversion.  Post processing was done with Google’s Picasa photo editing software, which is available as a free download.

And here are the results:

2 Comments

Filed under Photography

Batting for a Broken System


Batting for a Broken System.
An exceptional article on how the e-book revolution and self-publishing gives consumers more choices and revives genres declared “dead” by traditional publishing houses.   It’s a direct rebuttal to a Wall Street Journal article that was riddled with one-sided reporting and inaccuracies.

Besides, let’s face it—if traditional publishing had gotten it right to begin with, they wouldn’t be struggling now.

Comments Off on Batting for a Broken System

Filed under Books, eReaders, Writing