Category Archives: Technology/New Stuff

An Award Nomination for RDougWicker.com


Seems the Jenny Mac Book Blog has discovered RDougWicker.com, and that Jenny likes what she sees.  She’s nominated this blog for the One Lovely Blog Award.  I’m not sure just how legit this award is, but I’ll play along as it seems pretty innocuous (despite a web search that shows no apparent master award site).

The “rules” require me to list seven random things about myself, thank the nominator (thank you, Jenny), link back to the nominator’s blog (see the link above), and nominate fifteen other bloggers (but, in a twist, I’m not going to tell the nominees just to see if they catch on — crafty, huh!)

Seven random things about myself:

  1. I’m madly and deeply in love with my wife of 33 years
  2. I’m very much proud of my two daughters
  3. I love a good practical joke
  4. I love writing humor
  5. I hate the negativity of this year’s presidential election, and the silliness that poses as “debate” this time around
  6. I’m an avid photographer
  7. I’m a devoted traveler

Fifteen blogs I really enjoy (and am nominating for this award):

  1. Secret Spartanburg
  2. PhotoBotos
  3. Bibliophilic Blather
  4. Get the Flick
  5. Big Al’s Books and Pals
  6. Candy’s Raves (and Rants)
  7. Daily Cheap Reads
  8. Red Adept Select
  9. Going Dutch
  10. Live in the Old Lane
  11. Kissing the Blarney
  12. Cora Buhlert
  13. Two Ends of the Pen
  14. Rantings of an Amateur Chef
  15. Victor Travel Blog

6 Comments

Filed under Author, Social Networking, Technology/New Stuff, Writing

Solar Power Redux—The June Figures


A Happy Installation Crew

June.  Historically El Paso’s hottest month of the year.  This year was no exception, with more days at or above 100° (37.8° Celsius) than El Paso usually gets during an entire summer.  Yes, this is the blog for which you solar energy fans have been waiting—an analysis of our first full monthly billing cycle while generating solar power, and during the highest demand month.

But, first, a correction.  In the second blog I posted on this subject, I erroneously reported that it appeared we were getting about 55¢ back for every $1.00 in excess energy we produced.  A nice young fellow from the El Paso Electric Company read that blog and called me up a few days later to better explain how to read the myriad meters and how to interpret the rather confusing billing.  Thus I can now report that we were in fact getting a dollar-for-dollar credit.

Now that the housekeeping is out of the way, here are the numbers comparing June 2011 with June 2012:

June, 2011

 

June, 2012

kWh Delivered to Home:

2,630

 

kWh Delivered to Home:

1,583

kWh Sent back to Elec. Co.:

N/A

 

kWh Sent back to Elec. Co.:

759

Net Usage:

2,630

 

Net Usage

824

Cost (first 1,000 kWh):

$87.45

 

Cost (first 1,000 kWh):

$72.06

Cost (over 1,000 kWh):

$134.39

 

Cost (over 1,000 kWh):

N/A

Fuel Charge:

$66.47

 

Fuel Charge:

$18.56

Customer Charge:

$5.00

 

Customer Charge:

$5.00

Cost Recovery Factor:

$4.44

 

Cost Recovery Factor:

$1.40

Military Recovery Factor:

$0.86

 

Military Recovery Factor:

$0.71

Total Charge:

$298.61

 

Residential Service Credit:

-$1.14

     

Total Charge:

$96.59

Impressive as those above figures may seem, there’s actually a whole lot more to the story.  That 759 kWh sent back to the El Paso Electric Company was excess power over and above what we used during the daylight generating period.  That means we were actually generating much more power than that 759 kWh would indicate—approximately 702 kWh more, or a total of 1,461 kWh for this billing cycle.

That means that my actual energy usage for June 2012 was actually around 2,265 kWh, or about 365 kWh less than June 2011.  The reason for the lower usage is most likely due to the installation of outdoor window shading to the 216 square feet of window area in our great room.  Those shades cut down the indoor heat transfer considerably, thus reducing the demand on our air conditioners somewhat even with this year’s brutal June heat wave.

The solar panels generated on average 47.13 kWh a day during the 31-day billing cycle.  Average daily energy use was 74.68.  That means we self-generated during the month of June just over 63% of our electric energy needs.  Over the course of a full year we should generate approximately 95% to 97%.

Time will tell, but for now we cannot adequately express how pleased we are with the first full month’s figures on our solar panel installation—$200 in savings the first month alone.

4 Comments

Filed under Technology/New Stuff

Watt’s Happenin’ Two


A follow-up to:  Watt’s Happenin’? Solar Power is Watt.

Well, the first bill in is.  Not a bill for an entire month during which we generated solar power, but instructive nevertheless.

Our two solar panel installations officially went online about 1:00 p.m. on the afternoon of Thursday, May 17.  Our May billing cycle ran from May 2 through June 5, and was divided into two separate and distinct bills to reflect our switchover to net metering.

During the period from May 2 until 1:00 p.m. on May 17, we used 429 kWh, which resulted in a charge of $47.68.  From 1:00 p.m. May 17 through June 5, total net consumption was 71 kWh for which we were charged $12.93.

But a breakdown of this 19½-day period reveals an even more detailed picture of what actually transpired energy-wise: Our total net metering energy credit was 536 kWh.  Household usage over this same time-frame was 607 kWh.  Thus, we were billed for 71 kWh of energy.  That means solar power generation covered 88% of our total energy bills from the time our solar panels went operational until the end of the May billing cycle.

How does all this compare with May of last year?  Good question.  In May of 2011 the billing cycle ran from May 4 through June 4.  Total usage during that period was 1,094 kWh, for which our El Paso Electric Company bill ran $130.08.  That means we used roughly the same amount of energy—1,094 kWh in 2011 vs 1,036 kWh for the same month in 2012—yet, our bill in 2012 was $60.61, or less than 47% of last year’s charge.  And remember—that’s with us generating solar power for only 19 ½ days out of the entire 33-day billing cycle, or about 59% of the month.

That’s not the complete story, however.  During that 19½ days we actually produced 970 kWh.  Yet, net metering only credited us with 536 kWh.  Thus, it appears that we only get credited about 55 kWh for every 100 kWh we put into the El Paso Electric Company power grid.  I knew going in that it wasn’t going to be a 1-for-1 exchange with the electric company, but until now I didn’t know what the actual rate of return would be.

June will be the true test.  That will be our first full billing cycle during which we generated solar power.  June historically is also El Paso’s hottest month, and thus it is the month requiring the most extensive use of energy-intensive air conditioning.  We’ve already had four days this June at or above 100°, and we’re anticipating triple-digit temperatures for six of the next seven days.

So, expect a more detailed cost-to-benefit analysis in about a month.

3 Comments

Filed under Technology/New Stuff