That John Mica—He’s Such a Tool!


It appears there are a lot of people who are outraged at Congressman John Mica, who represents Florida’s 7th Congressional District and who chairs the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

You remember Congressman Mica, don’t you?  We’ve talked about him before, and how he single-handedly caused the furlough of nearly 4,000 FAA employees and subsequently cost somewhere between 70,000 (low estimate) to 85,000 (high estimate) construction workers around the nation their livelihoods for nearly two full weeks.  Those are people who depended on those jobs to support families, pay mortgages, make payments on their cars, and pay tuition costs for their college-bound children this upcoming semester.

And then Congressman Mica went on vacation, fully intending to leave all these people out of work for five full weeks and probably much longer.  Nice guy.

The reason for the shutdown has been covered extensively, but in a nutshell it was over Congressman Mica’s objection to the very democratic principles under which he runs for reelection every two years.  Congressman Mica’s masters . . . excuse me . . . large campaign contributor Delta Air Lines . . . want to continue counting as “no votes” the ballots of those who are eligible but who choose not to participate in a union election.

Using that criteria, Congressman Mica himself would not have won reelection in his district even though he garnered 69% of the vote.

That’s because according to Congressman Mica, a ballot not cast should count as a “no” vote.

There were about 580,000 eligible voters in Congressman Mica’s district last election.  A little over 268,000—or just 46% of those eligible to vote—bothered to cast a ballot.  Of those 268,000 voters, Congressman Mica’s opponent took in 83,000 votes.  This means (according to the rules Congressman Mica wants reinstated when it comes to union elections) that Congressman Mica only received 32% of the eligible vote last election, and by his standards should not even be in office today because 68% of the eligible voters in his district “voted” against him.

But Congressman Mica doesn’t run under those rules, and wouldn’t willingly do so even if such a change were proposed.

There’s a word for that.

Congressman Mica took a lot of flack for this shutdown, even from within his own party, when he threw out of work somewhere between 75,000 and 90,000 wage earners.  He was shouted down from every corner of the country, from both sides of the aisle, and from the Op-Ed pages of several newspapers.  So, how did Congressman Mica react to all this directed anger?

He changed his story.  And now he’s attempting to rewrite history to repair his self-wounded image and reputation.  Here’s what’s happening in this latest outrage and direct insult to your intelligence:

Congressman Mica attempted to obfuscate his actions on behalf of Delta Air Lines by inserting into an FAA funding extension bill language that would have ended Essential Air Service (EAS) to rural communities, specifically targeting communities in states represented by his Democratic committee counterparts in the Senate.  How do we know that this targeted attack on EAS services was meant to pressure Senators on the union issue?

Because Congressman Mica said so himself.  Very, very publicly.  At a conference of airport executives, Congressman Mica stated before those assembled in the room:

“It’s (EAS funding) just a tool to try to motivate some action to get this (union elections issue) resolved.”

Congressman Mica then went on to say that if the union election issue were “resolved” (meaning resolved to his satisfaction and to hell with what anyone else thinks on the matter),  then:

“. . . the rest (meaning the FAA funding extension) can fall into place within twenty minutes.”

Those are Congressman Mica’s words before this whole thing blew up in his face and cost tens of thousands of workers their paychecks.  So, what is he saying about all this now?

All of a sudden it’s no longer about union elections at all, according to Congressman Mica who is now conveniently ignoring his earlier statements to the contrary—statements, I might add, that were made in front of a room full of witnesses and widely reported in the media.  Now, Congressman Mica is proclaiming to all who will listen that this whole shutdown was to save $16.5 million in EAS subsidies going to a select few airports . . . airports that just happened to be mostly concentrated in the aforementioned states represented by certain Democratic Senators who opposed Congressman Mica’s peculiar and , quite frankly, indefensible stand on democratic principles.

I’m not calling Congressman Mica a liar, but even the math makes a mockery of this latest claim.

For Congressman Mica to be believed now, one would have to ignore the fact that in order to “save” $16.5 million dollars, he was willing to forgo somewhere in the neighborhood of $350 million dollars in lost aviation tax revenue during the shutdown, the lost income taxes of the workers he heartlessly threw out onto the streets across America, and the amounts these workers then had to claim in unemployment benefits and for public assistance.

You would also have to believe that he was willing to cost the FAA an additional $525 million in lost aviation tax revenue had his shutdown gone for the full five weeks he was perfectly willing to endure and indeed intended by timing this “crisis” to coincide with the August Congressional Recess.

In other words, Congressman Mica wants you to now believe that he thought it a good idea to cost local, state, and federal governments upwards of a one billion dollars or more in economic damage and lost tax revenues to save the federal government $16.5 million in EAS subsidies.

Or, put another way, enough money to fund those subsidies for the next 60+ years.

“But wait—There’s more!” as Ron Popeil would say.

Now, Congressman Mica has gone on the attack against anyone who would remind people of his real and very publicly stated reasons for throwing tens of thousands of workers out of work and personally costing the FAA over a third of a billion dollars in lost revenue badly needed to maintain and upgrade this nation’s vital aviation infrastructure.

The Association of Flight Attendants is a prime example.  Members of the AFA recently picketed in Jacksonville, Orlando, St. Augustine, and at sites in Texas to bring attention to the totally unnecessary pain and suffering Congressman Mica caused because of his my-way-or-the-highway approach to legislation and his attempted extortion of sitting members of the U.S. Senate to acquiesce to his demands on behalf of campaign contributor Delta Air Lines.

Here’s what C0ngressman Mica had to say about the assembled demonstrators:

“They’re (AFA) being used as dupes and tools in a larger national debate.  And actually I feel kind of pity for them because of the way they’re being abused by some of the leadership in Washington.

No “pity” for the tens of thousands of construction workers Congressman Mica sidelined.  No reference to how they were “abused” by him.  As for people being “duped,” that’s what Congressman Mica is attempting to do now that he’s been exposed for the callous, uncaring, abusive bully that he is.

And then there’s that “tool” word again.  Notice that?  Congressman Mica apparently likes that word very much.  Essential Air Service was merely a “tool” to be used to further his agenda on behalf of Delta Air Lines, and now those who would remind people of this are themselves “tools” (and “dupes”) being used (and “abused”) by those who oppose him.  Starting to get the big picture on this schoolyard bully, now?

Have you contacted your congressional representative yet?  Have you asked your representative why this man is still in charge of a committee as important to this nation as this?  If not, why not?  It only takes a minute to e-mail your representative and move to get Congressman Mica out of a position in which he can continue to do hundreds of millions of dollars worth of damage—locally, at the state level, and even federally.

Please act before it’s too late.  This latest extension runs out on September 16, and Congressman Mica has already demonstrated that he doesn’t care who or even how many he hurts when it comes to getting what he and Delta Air Lines want.  America can no longer afford Congressman John Mica as Chairman of the House Committee Transportation and Infrastructure.  The price is just too great.

2 Comments

Filed under Aviation Safety

2 responses to “That John Mica—He’s Such a Tool!

  1. willy's avatar willy

    Is Delta Airlines still charging our soldiers $50.00 for excess baggage on their return flights to America after serving tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan? Does Congressman Mica support Delta on these luggage fees?

    • In early June, Delta Air Lines decided against continuing that policy because of public outrage. Now, Delta allows service members traveling under military orders one additional piece of luggage without charge.

      As for John Mica’s stand at the time on charging fees to our already overextended and underpaid military, you’ll have to ask him. All I know is that I don’t recall hearing any protest on this from him back then, and I’d be surprised if he did say anything considering his campaign took in $620,000 in contributions last election cycle from Delta and other airlines.

      Many of those same airline contributors, by the way, much more than recouped that $620,000 investment, because all but three airlines raised fares to match any potential tax savings that might have otherwise been passed on to the public. Thus, the lion’s share of that $350 million in lost tax revenue became nothing less than a huge financial ‘gift’ bestowed on airlines by Congressman Mica.