Category Archives: Opinion Piece

Memorial Day Missive Redux

Today I present a rerun of last year’s missive on how the nation has failed the all-volunteer military.  It’s become a national disgrace.  I’m rerunning this because of this L.A. Times article I stumbled across today (please take the time to read it; it’s that important):  U.S. military and civilians are increasingly divided

And, now, from last year’s Memorial Day blog posting:

American Cemetery in Normandy, France

Once again National barbecue and Outdoor Grill Day is upon us . . . or so it seems from the lack of solemnity that greets this supposedly somber day.

In the waning days of the Vietnam War this country ended military conscription — “The Draft” — and with the draft’s demise so, too, ended any concept of shared sacrifice on the home front during time of war.  In wars prior to and throughout most of Vietnam citizens were asked to send their fathers and sons to battle, and to support the war effort through rationing, volunteerism, and, yes, even taxes.  Upon their return our fathers and sons were propped up during their transition from the horrors of war to the mundaneness of a civilian, nine-to-five, off-on-weekends existence.  We paid for their college education, tended to their wounds both physical and mental, rehabilitated their disabilities, and returned them to society for the most part as fully functioning members.

June 6 will mark the 70th anniversary of D-Day

Back then the Veterans Administration was a thing of wondrous humanity that defined how we as a nation cared for our warriors in their time of need.  It defined us as a people, and it let those who fought our battles know that we would not abandon them once the gunfire ceased.

Not so today.  We have now as a society isolated ourselves from wars we send our fellow citizens to fight.  No longer do we send our own off to perhaps die.  Now we are content to get someone else’s child — usually from the lower income and educational strata of our society — to “volunteer” into perhaps their only shot at a better life.

Meanwhile, we allow our political leaders to sell us on avoiding any related wartime pain while at the same time allowing corporate profiteers to enrich themselves on the sacrifices of others.  There is no rationing.  No one is asked to curtail their standard of living.  Taxes are cut.  The costs of today’s wars are pushed forward to future generations.  Our leaders tell us that it’s our patriotic duty to take the family and, “. . . get down to Disney World,” rather than do the unpopular things necessary as a society that has made the collective decision to wage war.

If the Draft was Good Enough for Them then it is Good Enough for Us

Now that the post-9/11 wars are coming to a close — one of which was totally optional and complete folly; and the whole raison d’être for the other having ended over three years ago on May 2, 2011 — we are once again failing our warriors at the most basic, civilized level.  This is far from new.  We as a nation have failed in this area ever since conscription ended in this country over forty years ago.

And that won’t change until conscription returns.  Needless wars will continue to be fought and necessary wars will extend well beyond the stated mission goal is reached as long as political leaders and business executives profit without risk to their own progeny and the majority of voters are isolated from any shared sacrifice and pain.

So, to clarify the title of this Memorial Day message, let me state the following:

When I say that the all-volunteer military has been a complete and utter failure I don’t mean that our men and women in uniformed service have failed us.  Far from it.  I mean that we as a nation have failed them, and it’s well beyond time to make amends by returning the pain and sacrifice of war back to the home front.  When everyone’s child is at risk, only then will our returning warriors get the help they so desperately deserve.

German Bunker Overlooking Pointe de Hoc, Normandy

1 Comment

Filed under Opinion Piece, R. Doug Wicker

The Real Culprit in the Germanwings Flight 9525 Crash

Doomed Germanwings Airbus D-AIPX — Photo from Wikipedia article on Germanwings Flight 9525

I just this past week returned to the U.S. from an extended trip to South and Central America, and much has happened in aviation safety since I left.  Therefore I’m postponing until next week the continuation of my series on our fall 2014 cruise into the Sea of Cortez to concentrate on such matters today and Wednesday.  Fun Photo Friday will still await you however with some interesting flora photos of desert flowers.

It appears with near certainty that Germanwings copilot Andreas Lubitz intentionally crashed Germanwings Flight 9525 deliberately killing himself, five other crew members, and 144 passengers on March 24 of this year.  Not so apparent is that he had a lot of help dating back to an innovative Boeing design concept made way back in 1967 — a concept that accelerated in acceptance in the 1980s to become the de facto standard for airliners today.

That concept was the elimination from the cockpit of the flight engineer position.

Oddly enough just two or three days before the Germanwings crash I was having an interesting dinner conversation on the topic of flight engineers with a retired Qantas pilot.  I remarked that I thought the elimination of that position from cockpits was a huge mistake at the time, and that subsequent events had proven me correct.  Little did I suspect that my points would receive further validation just a few days later.

But first a little history:

In the early days of commercial aviation cockpits routinely contained five crew members — pilot, copilot, flight engineer, navigator, and radio operator.  As radio equipment became more reliable and easier to operate the first position to go was that of the radio operator.  Advancements in navigation eventually made navigators redundant.  Jet engines eventually did the same for the flight engineer, whose job on piston aircraft was to monitor aircraft systems and to diagnose and correct system abnormalities and failures.  That was quite a tall order in the early days of multi-engine piston aircraft and variable-pitch propellers.  Not so much with the advent of turbojet technology and the computerization of systems.

But in my view, as I expressed to my ex-Qantas dinner companion, the flight engineer performed another equally valuable yet unadvertised function.  The flight engineer was the last defense in the event that something went wrong with the human element of flying — incapacitation of either of the pilots, an attempted breech of the cockpit, and, yes, even suicide by aircraft.  And I had the facts on my side to back up that claim.

First let us consider intentional crashing incidents involving airliners equipped with a flight engineer.  There are two of which I’m aware, and one of those was actually a DC-10 being used to haul freight rather than passengers.

  • Japan Airlines Flight 350; DC-8-61; February 9, 1982 — Captain Seiji Katagiri attempted to crash the DC-8 while on final approach to Tokyo’s Haneda Airport.  First officer (copilot) Yoshifumi Ishikawa and Second Officer (flight engineer) Yoshimi Ozaki managed to wrest the controls from Captain Katagiri, but not in time to save the aircraft from landing almost 1,000 feet/300 meters short of the runway into shallow water.  There were 24 fatalities, but 150 survived thanks in no small part to the presence of that third member of the cockpit crew.
  • Federal Express Flight 705; DC-10-30; April 7, 1994 — Auburn Calloway was riding in the jump seat (spare cockpit seat) of the DC-10.  Unbeknownst to Captain David Sanders, First Officer James Tucker, and Second Officer Andrew Peterson, Mr. Calloway was about to be fired from Federal Express even though he was still in possession of company credentials that allowed him access to the cockpit.  Also unknown to the crew was the fact that Mr. Calloway’s guitar case contained four hammers (two claw and two sledge) and a speargun.  Mr. Calloway attempted to kill the flight crew with the intention of commandeering the DC-10 and deliberately crashing it into Federal Express facilities in Memphis.  Despite horrendous injuries and severe damage to the aircraft, including inverted flight and near supersonic velocities performed to throw their attacker off balance, the crew were able to subdue Mr. Calloway and perform an emergency landing.

Now let’s take a look had what has happened since the elimination of that third crew member:

  • SilkAir Flight 185; Boeing 737-300; 19 December, 1997 — While cruising at Flight Level 350 (thirty-five thousand feet) Captain Tsu Way Ming rose to leave the cockpit.  On his way out the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) stopped recording, presumably after Captain Tsu intentionally silenced it by pulling the circuit breaker supplying power to the CVR.  From this point on everything is pretty much speculation because there is no CVR recording.  The presumed sequence of events would have Captain Tsu reentering the cockpit and either manufacturing a reason for First Officer Duncan Ward to leave the cockpit or outright incapacitating him.  At any rate, there was no third crew member to stop what happened next.  A short time later the flight data recorder (FDR) “failed” and the aircraft entered a steep dive.  There were no survivors out of the 97 passengers and seven crew.
  • EgyptAir Flight 990; Boeing 767-366ER; October 31, 1999 — Shortly after Captain Ahmed El-Habashi left the cockpit to use the lavatory, relief First Officer Gameel Al-Batouti is recorded by the CVR saying in Egyptian Arabic “I rely on God.”  About a minute later the aircraft is throttled back and nosed over and put into a dive.  Captain El-Habashi reentered and attempted to recover the aircraft.  The FDR recorder shows that while he was pulling back on the control yoke First Officer Al-Batouti was countering that by pushing his control yoke forward, resulting in a so-called “split condition” on the elevators — left (pilot side) elevator in the up position; right (copilot side) elevator down.  Again, no second officer to intervene and 217 passengers and crew are dead.
  • Royal Air Maroc Flight 630; ATR-42; August 21, 1994 — Captain Younes Khayati disengaged the autopilot, took over manual control of the aircraft, and sent the aircraft earthward from an altitude of 15,000 feet/4,600 meters.  Forty-four dead.
  • LAM Mozambique Airlines Flight 470; Embrear 190; November 29, 2013 — Captain Herminio dos Santos Fernandes locked out his first officer from the cockpit and then proceeded to reset the autopilot four times.  The fourth setting was for below ground level.  The CVR recorded the first officer repeatedly pounding on the cockpit door to gain entry.  Thirty-three dead.
  • Malaysia Airlines Flight 370; Boeing 777-200ER; 8 March, 2014 — I warned earlier about speculation in advance of finding the cockpit voice and flight data recorders, but if they are ever found and recovered I now believe we will discover the 227 passengers and 12 crew aboard that aircraft will have died under similar circumstances.

A disturbing trend I’m sure you’ll agree.

So much for the history lesson.  Now back to Germanwings Flight 9525:

Final flight path of Germanwings 9525 from Wikipedia

Already Lufthansa, parent company of Germanwings, has mandated a second person be in the cockpit at all times.  That means a flight attendant must be present if either the captain or first officer leaves the cockpit for any reason.  But is that really enough?  Will a flight attendant know what the remaining pilot is doing with the controls?  Would she be able to wrest control from a suicidal pilot if necessary?  And what if she did somehow do that, what then?  Is she expected to recover the aircraft from a dive until the other pilot manages to regain entry into the cockpit?

Descent profile of Germanwing 9525 from Wikipedia

Pretty laughable “solution” when you consider what’s expected of that flight attendant.

What’s needed is a third qualified pilot (yes, flight engineers were qualified) in the cockpit.  But don’t expect that to happen.  That’s another salary airlines don’t want to pay — the real reason airlines wanted that position eliminated in the first place.

Meanwhile, how long before I’m proven correct yet again?


Filed under Aviation Safety, Opinion Piece, R. Doug Wicker

Intellectual Property Theft? You Decide!

There is a website that has lately taken a liking to my travel-related posts.  So much so that they’ve been using an automated skimmer and reposting them, taking credit for the post, and not linking back to my blog.  If not for the copyright notice on my photos you would think I was working for these people under the name “RDoug” — no last name given, no website indicated, no working link back to my website.  Nothing.   What you do see, as an example from their reposting of my Waimea Canyon blog, is this:

Posted on 2015/02/11 | By destinary | Leave a response

Kind of implies that they authored the post, doesn’t it?  Certainly doesn’t say anything about R. Doug Wicker or  Go to the actual repost and that attributes the material thusly, “By RDoug,” in which the highlighted “RDoug” appears to be a link but in fact takes you to a blank screen.  And, again, you’ll notice that my last name was omitted.

Then you go to their “Copyrights” page and you’ll see this bit of convoluted absurdity:

Inevitably there are those who are concerned with copyright issues. The Destinary simply promotes what the blogger reports to WordPress as being “Publicly Available ” content. When a blogger is concerned with copyright issues, it is NOT this auto-blog’s responsibility to protect a blogger’s content from public exposure. it is the blogger’s responsibility to ensure that the blogger does not expose the blogger’s own content to the public domain where it can be “picked-up” by search engines, and aggregation, curation and other services, such as – the Destinary.

Things bloggers can do to prevent having their posts promoted by WordPress:

  1. Do not use the tags tracked by this service to specifically avoid having the posts promoted at this and similar sites.
  2. When writing the post, mark the post as “password protected” or “private” in the right sidebar if a blogger does not want a specific post promoted. A blogger can display a copy of the password on the blogger’s site for password protected posts; and, the blogger can personally distribute links of private posts to the blog’s subscribers.
  3. Click the Writing subtab of the Settings tab, scroll to the bottom of the page and remove the auto-promotion services that are listed under the Update Services section if the blogger does not want WordPress to distribute the blogger’s content.
  4. Click the Reading subtab of the Settings tab, change the blog’s syndication feed to Zero (0) if the blogger does not want any post promoted by WordPress.
  5. Click the Reading subtab of the Settings tab, change the blog’s syndication feed to show a Summary instead of the Full Text, if the blogger does want the blog promoted but does not want the full text publicized.
  6. Create a “subscription-only pay wall ” around the content. There is a financial reason provides a “free” blogging option; must be making money from the blogger’s content somehow in order to maintain the service. If a blogger wants more personal control over the blog’s content, the blogger can buy a premium plan from WordPress, then wrap the blog within a subscription pay-wall.

Please Note:

  • As long as the blogger maintains the symbiotic connection between the Destinary and blogger’s post, this site will ping the blogger’s site to record a “Read ” for the post whenever someone clicks on the article at the Destinary.

  • The Destinary does not retain published content. All posts are unpublished after seven (7) days and purged (deleted) from our system within one (1) week of being unpublished. Beyond the initial boost that the Destinary may give the blogger’s post with the search engines, any long-term interest in the blogger’s content will be directed to the blogger’s site by search engines.

  • Keep things in perspective: The fully automated Destinary does not know who you are (nor does it care). The fully automated Destinary does not know the name of your Blog (nor does it care). It is the blogger’s personal responsibility to maintain the blogger’s content in a manner suitable to the blogger. But, after the blogger relinquishes that control of the content to the public domain, the blogger cannot be dismayed when the content appears in unexpected places.

So, now it’s my fault that I make it easy to reuse my material by making it readily available to my viewers for their convenience, and because I tag my posts appropriately to assist people in finding them.  Okay.  I can play that game.  First of all, I’ve added the tags “travel, photography, travel photography,  and Waimea Canyon” to this post to see if I can trigger a Destinary reposting of this.  Wouldn’t that be delicious?

Secondly, you’ll now see the following appended to all future travel-related posts here:

By the way, if you’re reading this and other material authored by me on The Destinary website, this post was not “Posted on (fill in the date) | By destinary” as they’ve been erroneously claiming; this material was in fact reposted.  The Destinary have also been claiming the right to do so, without links back to the original and without full attribution (“by RDoug” and a nonworking link is not proper attribution) with a rather bizarre interpretation of U.S. copyright law in which they claim I’m responsible for changing my RSS feed settings so that they cannot skim my material for commercial purposes.  That would make reading my blog less convenient for you, which I’m not willing to do.  As such, I’ll be running this little diatribe on all travel related posts until they cease and desist, along with this:

© 2015 R. Doug Wicker (
All right reserved — that includes you Destinary

Final note:  Considering this is a site run by a travel agency, you may want to rethink doing business with them.

And finally, let’s make these people really famous.  The Destinary website is registered to:

Registrant Name: Sonia Platt
Registrant Organization: Indianapolis Tour & Travel

So, is this theft of intellectual property?  I’ll let you decide.  If you believe it isn’t, then by all means continue doing business with them.  But if you believe it is . . . .

© 2015 R. Doug Wicker (
All right reserved — that includes you Destinary


Filed under Opinion Piece, Photography, R. Doug Wicker, Social Networking, travel, Writing